Band 6.5 Sample: Some people think that children under 18 years old should receive full-time education. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Introductory Statement:
Few individuals believe that children below the age of 18 years should necessarily get full-time education. This essay entirely agrees with the given notion. This essay tends to elaborate points firstly that students can focus on their studies properly and secondly part-time jobs can distract students from their studies.
Body Paragraph 1:
To start with, some people argue that students under the age of 18 years should receive full-time education as they can focus on their studies and can do their best. As the young children are the future of the nation. Students can get good grades and good jobs in the future so that they can have good life style and can take the nation to the greater heights. For example, a survey was conducted by NAAC according to which students who received full-time studies scored good marks and had a good future.
Body Paragraph 2:
Students who are doing part time jobs during their teenage tend to get distracted from their studies. When they get money from their work, they often think to neglect their studies as they can earn from their part-time jobs. Students may become spendthrift. By all these things students can spoil their future. Moreover, students with part time jobs feel exhausted at the end of day and this also effects their performance in studies. For example, an article was published by the newspaper ‘The Hindustan times’ which stated that students with part time jobs often feel exhausted and they tend to neglect their studies.
Conclusion:
To conclude this, students should get full-time education so that they can focus on their studies and have a good future rather than getting a part time job and neglecting their studies.
Band 6.5 Sample: Some people think that children under 18 years old should receive full-time education. To what extent do you agree or disagree?